G. Dhonneur et al., COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF MIVACURIUM ON THE DIAPHRAGM AND GENIOHYOID MUSCLES, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 77(6), 1996, pp. 716-719
Although subjects often report difficulty with swallowing shortly afte
r receiving neuromuscular blocking agents, difficulty with swallowing
during recovery from neuromuscular blocking agents appears to be infre
quent. We have used electromyography to compare onset and recovery at
the diaphragm and geniohyoid airway muscles after an intubating dose o
f mivacurium (0.2 mg kg(-1)) to determine if the geniohyoid muscles we
re particularly sensitive to neuromuscular blocking agents. Twelve adu
lts undergoing elective surgery were anaesthetized with propofol and f
entanyl and the trachea intubated without neuromuscular blocking agent
s. The left hypoglossal and right phrenic nerves were stimulated with
percutaneous needle electrodes and the electromyogram recorded with su
rface electrodes. EMG responses were measured after a bolus dose of mi
vacurium 0.2 mg kg(-1). Recordings were also made of the mechanical re
sponse of the adductor pollicis to supramaximal ulnar nerve stimulatio
n. There was no difference in the rate of onset of block for geniohyoi
d muscles and the diaphragm, but recovery to 25% and 90% of the contro
l response was shorter at the diaphragm (median 14.5 (95% confidence l
imits 12.9-15.3) min and 23.8 (21.7-26) min) than at the geniohyoid mu
scle (19.4 (15.6-20.1) min and 29.2 (26.3-31.4) min), respectively (P
< 0.05). When the train-of-four ratio of the mechanical response of th
e thumb reached 70%, the diaphragm and geniohyoid muscles had recovere
d completely in all patients.