ACUTE URETERAL OBSTRUCTION - VALUE OF SECONDARY SIGNS ON HELICAL UNENHANCED CT

Citation
Rc. Smith et al., ACUTE URETERAL OBSTRUCTION - VALUE OF SECONDARY SIGNS ON HELICAL UNENHANCED CT, American journal of roentgenology, 167(5), 1996, pp. 1109-1113
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
0361803X
Volume
167
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1109 - 1113
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-803X(1996)167:5<1109:AUO-VO>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the value of seco ndary signs of ureteral obstruction on helical unenhanced CT. MATERIAL S AND METHODS. Over a 19-month interval, 312 patients with acute flank pain were imaged with helical unenhanced CT. Ureteral stone disease w as confirmed to be present in 109 patients and confirmed to be absent in 111 patients. Ninety-two remaining patients had no confirmatory ima ging studies or surgery and were unable to be contacted for follow-up. For each of the 220 patients with a confirmed diagnosis, we determine d the presence or absence of ureteral or collecting system dilatation, perinephric stranding, symmetry of renal size, and renal stones. In a ll patients with a ureteral stone, we noted the presence or absence of a circumferential rim of soft-tissue attenuation (''tissue-rim'' sign ) surrounding each stone and each phlebolith. RESULTS. The sensitivity of each secondary sign was ureteral dilatation, 90%; perinephric stra nding, 82%; collecting system dilatation, 83%; and renal enlargement, 71%. The specificity of each secondary sign was ureteral dilatation, 9 3%; perinephric stranding, 93%; collecting system dilatation, 94%; and renal enlargement, 89%. Ureteral dilatation and perinephric stranding were both present or both absent in 181 of the 220 patients with a co nfirmed diagnosis. In this subgroup, this combination of signs had a p ositive predictive value of 99% and a negative predictive value of 95% . The odds ratio for the frequency of the tissue-rim sign with stones versus tissue-rim with phleboliths was 31:1. CONCLUSION. When using un enhanced CT to help diagnose acute flank pain, if one does not see a u reteral stone or does see an indeterminate but suspicious calcificatio n, then secondary signs of obstruction are important for diagnosis. Th e results of this study form the basis of an imaging algorithm that ca n be used when interpreting unenhanced CT images of patients with acut e flank pain.