RANDOMIZATION IS IMPORTANT IN STUDIES WITH PAIN OUTCOMES - SYSTEMATICREVIEW OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE-STIMULATION IN ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN

Citation
D. Carroll et al., RANDOMIZATION IS IMPORTANT IN STUDIES WITH PAIN OUTCOMES - SYSTEMATICREVIEW OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE-STIMULATION IN ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 77(6), 1996, pp. 798-803
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
00070912
Volume
77
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
798 - 803
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0912(1996)77:6<798:RIIISW>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
We set out to examine the evidence for the importance of randomization of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in acute post-o perative pain. Controlled studies were sought; randomization and analg esic and adverse effect outcomes were summarized. Forty-six reports we re identified by searching strategies. Seventeen reports with 786 pati ents could be regarded unequivocally as randomized controlled trials ( RCT) in acute postoperative pain. No meta-analysis was possible. In 15 of 17 RCT, we judged there to be no benefit of TENS compared with pla cebo. Of the 29 excluded trials, 19 had pain outcomes but were not RCT ; in 17 of these 19 TENS studies, the authors concluded that TENS had a positive analgesic effect. No adverse effects were reported. Non-ran domized studies overestimated treatment effects.