As the use of ICDs increases, more young patients will be eligible to
receive these devices. Such patients may have different concerns than
older patients who more commonly receive ICDs. We investigated quality
-of-life issues in patients followed by the Yale electrophysiology ser
vice who were less than or equal to 40 years old (mean = 28) at the ti
me of ICD implant. Mean time since ICD placement was 3.3 years. Each p
atient received a modified SF-36 health questionnaire; 16 (88%) of 18
responded. Nine were women; ten were married. The highest education le
vel attained was high school for 6 (37%), and college or beyond for 10
(63%). Ten patients were employed; eight held She same job before and
after ICD placement. Four women conceived after ICD implantation; one
experienced ICD discharge during pregnancy. All delivered healthy inf
ants. All patients felt their health was good to excellent, with 6 (38
%) reporting an improvement in health since ICD placement. All felt ca
pable of performing the activities of daily living, while 68% engaged
freely in moderate physical activities. All patients felt they were av
erage to very attractive. However, 63% worried about how their clothes
fit with the ICD. Three quarters of the patients felt the ICD interfe
red with social interactions, while 50% were concerned about sexual en
counters. Thus, even though these young patients have body image conce
rns and may limit their activities to some degree, they are productive
, active members of society who have benefitted from ICD placement.