Fk. Mcsweeney et al., WITHIN-SESSION CHANGES IN RESPONDING DURING CONCURRENT SCHEDULES WITHDIFFERENT REINFORCERS IN THE COMPONENTS, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 66(3), 1996, pp. 369-390
Rats and pigeons responded on several concurrent schedules that provid
ed different reinforcers in the two components (food and water for rat
s, Experiment 1; wheat and mixed grain for pigeons, Experiment 2). The
rate of responding and the time spent responding on each component us
ually changed within the session. The within-session changes in respon
se rates and time spent responding usually followed different patterns
for the two components of a concurrent schedule. For most subjects, t
he bias and sensitivity to reinforcement parameters of the generalized
matching law, as well as the percentage of the variance accounted for
, decreased within the session. Negative sensitivity parameters were s
ometimes found late in the session for the concurrent food-water sched
ules. These results imply that within-session changes in responding co
uld cause problems for assessing the validity of quantitative theories
of concurrent-schedule responding when the components provide differe
nt reinforcers. They question changes in a general motivational state,
such as arousal, as a complete explanation for within-session changes
in responding. The results are compatible with satiation for, or sens
itization-habituation to, the reinforcers as explanations.