S. Riedl et al., EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF MENISCAL TEARS - SIGNIFICANCE OF 3-DIMENSIONAL SONOGRAPHY, Ultraschall in der Medizin, 17(5), 1996, pp. 247-252
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging",Acoustics
The clinical value of two-dimensional ultrasound in examining the meni
sci of the knee compared to other methods is controversial. We studied
the utility diagnosed by three-dimensional sonography in evaluating m
eniscal tears. Method: 96 menisci with standardised artificial lesions
were examined in a bath of Ringer solution. Two-dimensional ultrasoun
d was compared to three-dimensional ultrasound, which creates three-di
mensional reconstruction of sequential ultrasonographic images. Result
s: The three-dimensional ultrasound had a higher sensitivity of 88% vs
69% with a specificity of 83% vs 94% for the diagnosis of meniscal te
ars compared with the two-dimensional method. The sensitivity in imagi
ng was 54% in each case for longitudinal tears, 63% vs 96% for horizon
tal tears, 67% vs 37% for oblique tears and 54% vs 0% for radial tears
. The difference of these results, however, was not statistically sign
ificant. Radial tears were more frequently diagnosed by three-dimensio
nal sonography. Conclusion: In our model, sonographic diagnosis of men
iscal tears was improved only partially by using three-dimensional ult
rasound. Whether in vivo other factors alter the minimal differences b
etween the two techniques is the subject of ongoing investigation.