EXPERIMENTAL SOIL ACIDIFICATION AND RECOVERY AT THE BEAR BROOK WATERSHED IN MAINE

Citation
Le. Rustad et al., EXPERIMENTAL SOIL ACIDIFICATION AND RECOVERY AT THE BEAR BROOK WATERSHED IN MAINE, Soil Science Society of America journal, 60(6), 1996, pp. 1933-1943
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
ISSN journal
03615995
Volume
60
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1933 - 1943
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-5995(1996)60:6<1933:ESAARA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The response and subsequent recovery of soils (Typic Haplorthods) to a cidification by dilute H2SO4 (2000 and 4000 mol(c) ha(-1) yr(-1) of SO 4), HNO3 (2000 and 4000 mol(c) ha(-1) yr(-1) of NO3), and combined H2S O4-HNO3 (2000 mol(c) ha(-1) yr(-1) each of SO4 and NO3) were studied a t the Bear Brook Watershed in Maine. Treatments were delivered to eigh teen 15 by 15 m plots (three plots per treatment) during four field se asons from 1988-1991. Recovery was monitored for the ensuing two years . Changes in soil and soil solution chemistry were evaluated using ten sion lysimeters and buried mineral soil bags. Soil solutions responded rapidly to all treatments with increased concentrations of SO4 (four to eight times ambient) and NO3 (39 to 88 times ambient), depending on treatment, accompanied by increased concentrations of Ca and Mg (thre e to five times ambient) from the upper B horizon. As solutions passed through the upper 25 cm of the pedon, concentrations of SO4 and the s um of base cations decreased significantly. Results from buried minera l soil bags located directly below the forest Boor indicated that a re latively reversible SO4 sorption mechanism was responsible for attenua ting most SO4 losses from these soils. Following 4 yr of acid inputs a nd 2 yr of recovery, soil and soil solution chemistry were remarkably unchanged, demonstrating that this hardwood forest soil was not irreve rsibly altered and could quickly recover.