J. Kautzner et al., IS VAGAL INNERVATION TO THE ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE IMPAIRED AFTER RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION OF THE SLOW ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL PATHWAY, PACE, 19(11), 1996, pp. 1993-1997
To assess the potentially adverse effects of RF catheter ablation (RFC
A) of the slow AV nodal pathway on the parasympathetic innervation to
the AV node in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), A
V nodal conduction was evaluated following vagal stimulation by means
of a phenylephrine bolus injection (200 mu g) before and after RFCA in
ten patients (mean age, 37 +/- 14 years). Nine patients with AV reent
rant tachycardia (AVRT) due to a left free wall accessory pathway serv
ed as a control group (mean age of 37 +/- 12 years). Whereas no prolon
gation of the AH interval was observed in the AVNRT group following th
e phenylephrine bolus during sinus rhythm, despite a significant slowi
ng in sinus rate, phenylephrine administration in AVRT patients was as
sociated with both slowing of the sinus rate and prolongation of the A
H interval. Following successful RFCA, the same responses were observe
d. To delineate the indirect effect of heart rate on AV conduction in
response to the phenylephrine bolus, the AH interval was also measured
during fixed atrial pacing. A marked prolongation of the AH interval
occurred in both groups following phenylephrine administration. This p
rolongation was biphasic in 50% of AVNRT patients before ablation, sug
gesting a predominant effect of vagal stimulation on the fast AV nodal
pathway. RFCA was associated with disappearance of discontinuous AV c
onduction in all but one patient with AVNRT. Vagal stimulation caused
the same amount of AH interval prolongation as before RFCA in both stu
dy groups. In conclusion, patients with AVNRT have a preserved modulat
ion of AV nodal conduction in response to vagal stimulation during sin
us rhythm. In addition, vagal stimulation seems to exert a predominant
effect on the fast AV nodal pathway. RFCA of the slow AV nodal path w
ay in patients with AVNRT does not ca use detectable damage to the vag
al innervation to the AV node.