Determinations of absolute paleointensity are often hampered by magnet
o-mineralogical changes produced within samples of lava flows during s
uccessive heatings. Such changes which directly affect the capacity fo
r a sample to acquire a partial thermoremanent magnetization (PTRM) ar
e reflected by negative pTRM checks, a deviation between the original
pTRM and a repeated measurement after heating at a higher temperature.
Because the deviations indicated by the PTRM checks can provide a dir
ect estimate of the effects to the pTRMs, we suggest that they can be
used to correct pTRMs. The correction method we present requires addit
ional measurements, in particular pTRM checks performed after each pTR
M and specific diagrams to detect acquisition of chemical remanence. P
erforming multiple successive pTRM checks can also provide information
on the blocking temperatures of the alteration product. These experim
ents conducted on lava flows from different localities show that the m
agnetomineralogical changes mainly involved grains with blocking tempe
ratures lower than the last heating step. The corrections have been te
sted on recent and historic lava flows from several localities. We hav
e also compared results on samples from the same lava flows that were
heated in air and in vacuum. The mean paleointensity values were found
to lie within less than 10% from the expected field intensity at each
site. The corrections resulted in the recovery of reliable paleointen
sity determinations for about twice as many specimens heated in vacuum
and 65% additional data for specimens heated in air. Successive heati
ngs at the same temperature in air are often accompanied by a time-dep
endent oxidation of the natural remanent magnetization which is respon
sible for paleointensity values lower than the expected field, a probl
em that is not related to the corrections. We conclude that correction
s can be used with fairly high confidence to the pTRMs performed in va
cuum and in air.