I. Haq et al., MOLECULAR ANCHORING OF DUPLEX AND TRIPLEX DNA BY DISUBSTITUTED ANTHRACENE-9,10-DIONES - CALORIMETRIC, UV MELTING, AND COMPETITION DIALYSIS STUDIES, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(44), 1996, pp. 10693-10701
Isothermal titration calorimetry, UV melting, and competition dialysis
techniques have been used to examine the binding of isomeric 1,4- and
2,6-bis(omega-aminopropionamido)-substituted anthracene-9,10-diones (
anthraquinones) with dA(n) . dT(n) duplexes and dT(n)-dA(n) . dT(n) tr
iplexes. Recent footprinting studies [Fox, K. R.; Polucci, P.; Jenkins
, T. C.; Neidle, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 7887-7891]
indicate that 2,6 derivatives, but not their 1,4 counterparts, differ
entially stabilize triple-stranded DNA and may have application in ant
igene chemotherapy. Thermodynamic investigations are here reported for
interaction with dA(18). dT(18) and dT(18)-dA(18). dT(18). The 2,6 co
mpound shows preferential tripler binding, with K-b values of 1.8 x 10
(4) M (duplex)(-1) and 2.2 x 10(5) M (tripler)(-1) at 25 degrees C in
aqueous solution, pH 6.0, whereas the 1,4 isomer favors duplex binding
, with K-b values of 1:1 x 10(5) M (duplex)(-1) and 3.5 x 10(4) M (tri
pler)(-1). Binding to the preferred DNA is enthalpically driven for ea
ch ligand, whereas binding to the disfavored DNA is either entropicall
y driven or enthalpy/entropy compensated. Further, the binding site si
zes (3.6 base pairs/base triplets) suggest DNA intercalation. Competit
ion dialysis studies with poly(dA). poly(dT) and poly(dA). poly(dT)(2)
confirm these binding preferences, and qualitative support is provide
d from UV melting experiments. Such studies reveal tripler disruption
by the 1,4 isomer at low drug concentrations while the 2,6 compound ef
fects stabilization toward thermal tripler denaturation. Spectrophotom
etric studies of each free ligand indicate self-association in aqueous
solution; with dimerization constants at 25 degrees C of (2.9 +/- 0.2
) x 10(3) and (3.2 +/- 0.1) x 10(3) M(-1) respectively for the 1,4 and
2,6 isomers. Taken together, these data provide a firm thermodynamic
basis for the contrasting duplex/tripler binding preferences of this i
someric family of ligands.