Me. Maganga et al., REPELLENCY OF VARIOUS OILS AND PINE OIL CONSTITUENTS TO HOUSE-FLIES (DIPTERA, MUSCIDAE), Environmental entomology, 25(5), 1996, pp. 1182-1187
Comparative repellency of pine, mineral, motor, and silicon oil to hou
se flies, Musca domestica L., was tested. In binary choice bioassays w
ith flies feeding on 20 mu l of watery honey solutions mixed with (tre
atment) or without (control) 10 mu l of one of the oils under investig
ation, only pine oil completely suppressed feeding and remained inhibi
tory even after 24 h. Approaching pine oil-treated honey solution, 95%
of flies were repelled at a distance >6 mm from the source. Analysis
of pine oil volatiles by coupled gas chromatographic-electroantennogra
phic detection (CC-EAD) analysis revealed 5 antennally active compound
s, 4 of which were identified by coupled GC-mass spectrometry as myrce
ne, p-cymene, gamma-terpinene, and (+/-)-linalool. Treatment of honey
solution with pine oil, the 4 compounds singly, or in quaternary combi
nation at 10 mu l each, equally and significantly reduced the number o
f feeding flies compared with untreated honey solution. At an amount o
f 1 mu l, only the linalool treatment inhibited feeding. In binary cho
ice experiments hath feeding and oviposition were significantly reduce
d on linalool-treated sources. Because By maggots naturally develop in
and rely on microbe-rich organic sources, gravid females may perceive
and avoid potential oviposition sites that are rich in antimicrobial
compounds such as linalool.