COMPARATIVE PHARMACOKINETICS OF 2 NEW STEROIDAL ESTROGENS AND ETHINYLESTRADIOL IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN

Citation
A. Baumann et al., COMPARATIVE PHARMACOKINETICS OF 2 NEW STEROIDAL ESTROGENS AND ETHINYLESTRADIOL IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN, Contraception, 54(4), 1996, pp. 235-242
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00107824
Volume
54
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
235 - 242
Database
ISI
SICI code
0010-7824(1996)54:4<235:CPO2NS>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
It was the aim of the study to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of the two new estrogens, ZK 136295 and ZK 115194, with those of ethin ylestradiol (EE(2)) after single intravenous (60 mu g) and oral (120 a nd 240 mu g) administration in 54 postmenopausal women. In particular, our objective was to examine whether one or both compounds were chara cterized by an improved oral bioavailability with less inter-subject v ariability than EE(2). Drug serum concentrations were determined using specific radioimmunoassays for EE(2) and ZK 136295, and a GC/MS/MS-me thod for ZK 115194. Following iv administration of the new estrogens a nd of EE(2), the drugs were rapidly distributed in the body. The mean terminal half-lives were calculated to be 12.3 +/- 12.4, 28.7 +/- 9.6, and 26.1 +/- 11.1 h for ZK 136295, ZK 115194, and EE(2), respectively . After oral administration of 120 mu g, the absolute bioavailability was calculated to be about 40% for ZK 136295 as well as for EE(2) with a high inter-individual variation (variation coefficient: 44 and 67%) . By doubling the dose, the systemic availability increased dose-depen dently for both drugs to about 70% with the same high interindividual variation. Following single oral administration of 240 mu g ZK 115194, the absolute bioavailability amounted to 33 +/- 19%. The present stud y clearly revealed that although the two new estrogens differed consid erably in their pharmacokinetic behavior, they demonstrated a reduced and highly variable systemic availability similar to that of EE(2). (C ) 1996 Elsevier Science Inc.