D. Petrie et al., AN EVALUATION OF PATIENT OUTCOMES COMPARING TRAUMA TEAM ACTIVATED VERSUS TRAUMA TEAM NOT ACTIVATED USING TRISS ANALYSIS, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 41(5), 1996, pp. 870-873
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of tr
auma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 12 who had the tra
uma team involved (TTA) in their resuscitative care to those that did
not (TTNA). Setting: Level I regional trauma center teaching hospital
with university affiliation, Methods: All trauma patients admitted bet
ween July 1, 1991 and August 31, 1994 with an ISS > 12 were identified
through the trauma registry. Burn patients, those who suffered their
injury > 24 hours before admission, and deaths in the emergency room w
ere excluded from analysis. The TRISS methodology, which offers a stan
dard approval for evaluating outcomes for different populations of tra
uma patients, was used to determine whether there was a difference in
outcomes between the two groups, To include patients who arrived at th
e trauma center intubated. a Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS)-
like analysis was also conducted on this patient population. Main Resu
lts: A total of 640 patients were identified; 417 (65.2%) in the TTA g
roup and 223 (34.8%) in the TTNA group. ii total of 448 (70%) were eli
gible for TRISS analysis and 574 (89.7%) were eligible for TRISS-like
analysis, Using the TRISS analysis, the TTA group had a Z statistic of
3.36 yielding a W score of 4.27. This compared to the TTNA group whos
e Z statistic was 0.30. Using the TRISS-like logistic regression equat
ion, the TTA group had a Z statistic of 6.50, yielding a W score of 8.
60 compared with the TTNA group whose Z statistic was 0.88. After cont
rolling for differences in the demographics of the two groups. the TTA
still had consistently higher Z scores, Conclusion: In a Level I trau
ma center, the outcomes of trauma patients with an LSS > 12 are statis
tically significantly better if the trauma team is activated than if t
he patients are managed an an individual service-by-service basis.