Ka. Davis et al., EFFECTS OF SOMATOSENSORY AND PARALLEL STIMULATION ON NEURONS IN DORSAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS, Journal of neurophysiology, 76(5), 1996, pp. 3012-3024
1. Single units and evoked potentials were recorded in the dorsal coch
lear nucleus (DCN) of paralyzed decerebrate cats in response to electr
ical stimulation at two sites: 1) in the somatosensory dorsal column n
uclei (together called MSN below for medullary somatosensory nuclei),
which activates mossy-fiber inputs to granule cells in superficial DCN
, and 2) on the free surface of the DCN, which activates granule cell
axons (parallel fibers) directly. The goal was to evaluate hypotheses
about synaptic interactions in the cerebellum-like circuitry of the su
perficial DCN. A four-pulse facilitation paradigm was used (50-ms inte
rpulse interval); this allows identification of three components of th
e responses of DCN principal cells (type IV units) to these stimuli. T
he latencies of the response components were compared with the latency
of the evoked potential in DCN, which signals the arrival of the para
llel fiber volley at the recording site. 2. The first component is a s
hort-latency inhibitory response; this component is seen only with MSN
stimulation and is seen almost exclusively in units also showing the
second component, the transient excitatory response. The short-latency
inhibitory component precedes the evoked potential. No satisfactory e
xplanation for the short-latency component can be given at present; it
most likely reflects a fast-conducting inhibitory input that arrives
at the type IV unit before the slowly conducting parallel fibers. 3. T
he second component is a transient excitatory response; this component
is seen with both MSN and parallel fiber stimulation; it is weak and
appears to be masked easily by the inhibitory response components. The
excitatory component occurs at the same latency as the evoked potenti
al and probably reflects direct excitation of principal cells by granu
le cell axons. The excitatory component is seen in about half the type
IV units for both stimulating sites. With MSN stimulation, the lack o
f excitation in some units suggests a heterogeneity of cochlear granul
e cells, with some carrying somatosensory information and some not car
rying this information; with parallel fiber stimulation, excitation pr
obably requires the stimulating and recording electrodes to be lined u
p on the same ''beam'' of parallel fibers. 4. The third component is a
long-lasting inhibitory response that is observed in virtually all ty
pe IV units with both MSN and parallel-fiber stimulation; its latency
is longer than the evoked potential. Evidence suggests that is propose
d by inhibitory input from cartwheel cells. The appearance of this inh
ibitory component in almost all type IV units can be accounted for by
the considerable spread of cartwheel-cell axons in the direction perpe
ndicular to the parallel fibers. 5. The evoked potential and all three
components of the unit response vary systematically in size over the
four pulses of the electrical stimulus These results can be accounted
for by two phenomena; 1) a facilitation of the granule cell synapses o
n all cell types that produces a steadily growing response through the
four pulses, resembles presynaptic facilitation, and is seen with bot
h MSN and parallel-fiber stimulation; and 2) a strong reduction in the
granule cell response between the first and second pulse for MSN stim
ulation only. This reduction probably occurs presynaptically in the gl
omerulus or in the granule cell itself and could reflect inhibitory in
puts. 6. The response components described above are seen in type IV u
nits recorded in both the fusiform-cell and deep layers of the DCN; th
is suggests that both pyramidal and giant cells are activated similarl
y. The simplest interpretation is that both principal cell types are a
ctivated by the cerebellum-like circuitry in superficial DCN. Alternat
ively, because giant cells appear to make limited contact with granule
-cell circuits of superficial DCN, this finding may suggest the existe
nce of currently undescribed granule cell circuits in deep DCN that ar
e similar in function to those in superficial DCN.