VARIATIONS IN THE USE OF DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDERS IN ICUS - FINDINGSFROM A NATIONAL STUDY

Citation
Rl. Jayes et al., VARIATIONS IN THE USE OF DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDERS IN ICUS - FINDINGSFROM A NATIONAL STUDY, Chest, 110(5), 1996, pp. 1332-1339
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System
Journal title
ChestACNP
ISSN journal
00123692
Volume
110
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1332 - 1339
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(1996)110:5<1332:VITUOD>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Study objectives: To describe the variation in frequency of do-not-res uscitate (DNR) orders in 42 US ICUs and to examine the relationship be tween published guidelines and qualitative observations about terminal care in 9 ICUs. Design: Prospective inception cohort. Setting: Forty- two ICUs in 40 US hospitals with more than 200 beds: 26 randomly selec ted and 14 large tertiary-care volunteers. Participants: A consecutive sample of 17,440 ICU admissions during 1988 to 1990. Measurements and results: We used age, race, comorbid conditions, disease, functional status, and acute physiology score on ICU day 1 to predict the likelih ood of a DNR order for each patient. A cross-validated model was then used to predict variations in the risk of an ICU DNR order from 0 to 4 5% (area under receiver operating characteristic curve=0.9). The model was then used to compare aggregate observed with predicted frequency of ICU DNR orders. Finally, we compared observations of DNR practices by a team of clinical and organizational researchers at 9 of the 42 IC Us with published guidelines and risk-adjusted DNR frequency: 1,577 ad missions (9%) had DNR orders written in the ICU (range, 1.5 to 22%). T he ICU site was a significant (p<0.001) predictor of variance in the p atient level model. DNR orders were written significantly (P<0.05) les s frequently than predicted in 5 and more frequently than predicted in 3 of 42 ICUs. Nonwhite patients had significantly (p=0.001) fewer DNR orders after adjustment. The research team's implicit judgments follo wing on-site analysis failed to distinguish ICUs with more or less DNR orders than predicted. Site-visited ICUs exhibited practices to emula te and practices to avoid. Conclusions: The frequency of ICU DNR order s can be predicted based on individual risk factors for groups of ICU patients. After adjusting for differences in patient characteristics, there is significant variation in the frequency of DNR orders in a nat ional sample of ICUs. These variations may be due to unmeasured differ ences in patient characteristics such as treatment preferences, religi ous affiliation, educational level, or physician practices. We found n o relationship between risk-adjusted DNR order frequency and adherence to published guidelines.