Study objectives: To describe the variation in frequency of do-not-res
uscitate (DNR) orders in 42 US ICUs and to examine the relationship be
tween published guidelines and qualitative observations about terminal
care in 9 ICUs. Design: Prospective inception cohort. Setting: Forty-
two ICUs in 40 US hospitals with more than 200 beds: 26 randomly selec
ted and 14 large tertiary-care volunteers. Participants: A consecutive
sample of 17,440 ICU admissions during 1988 to 1990. Measurements and
results: We used age, race, comorbid conditions, disease, functional
status, and acute physiology score on ICU day 1 to predict the likelih
ood of a DNR order for each patient. A cross-validated model was then
used to predict variations in the risk of an ICU DNR order from 0 to 4
5% (area under receiver operating characteristic curve=0.9). The model
was then used to compare aggregate observed with predicted frequency
of ICU DNR orders. Finally, we compared observations of DNR practices
by a team of clinical and organizational researchers at 9 of the 42 IC
Us with published guidelines and risk-adjusted DNR frequency: 1,577 ad
missions (9%) had DNR orders written in the ICU (range, 1.5 to 22%). T
he ICU site was a significant (p<0.001) predictor of variance in the p
atient level model. DNR orders were written significantly (P<0.05) les
s frequently than predicted in 5 and more frequently than predicted in
3 of 42 ICUs. Nonwhite patients had significantly (p=0.001) fewer DNR
orders after adjustment. The research team's implicit judgments follo
wing on-site analysis failed to distinguish ICUs with more or less DNR
orders than predicted. Site-visited ICUs exhibited practices to emula
te and practices to avoid. Conclusions: The frequency of ICU DNR order
s can be predicted based on individual risk factors for groups of ICU
patients. After adjusting for differences in patient characteristics,
there is significant variation in the frequency of DNR orders in a nat
ional sample of ICUs. These variations may be due to unmeasured differ
ences in patient characteristics such as treatment preferences, religi
ous affiliation, educational level, or physician practices. We found n
o relationship between risk-adjusted DNR order frequency and adherence
to published guidelines.