A. Inufusa et al., ANATOMIC CHANGES OF THE SPINAL-CANAL AND INTERVERTEBRAL FORAMEN ASSOCIATED WITH FLEXION-EXTENSION MOVEMENT, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 21(21), 1996, pp. 2412-2420
Study Design. A cadaveric study was done to analyze the dimensional ch
anges in the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen of the lumbar spi
ne with flexion and extension movements. Objectives. To investigate th
e relationship between flexion and extension movements and morphologic
changes in the spinal canal and the intervertebral foramen. Summary o
f Background Data. Previous studies have reported that the dimensions
of the spinal canal and the intervertebral foramen may change signific
antly with motion. The purpose of this study was to assess the quantit
ative changes in the spinal canal and the intervertebral foramen with
segmental flexion-extension movements. Methods. Nineteen fresh cadaver
ic spines yielding 25 motion segments were used. The lumbar segments w
ere frozen and then imaged in axial and sagittal projections by a comp
uted tomography scanner. They were thawed then, and the motion segment
s were loaded to 5.7 Nm in flexion (13 motion segments) and in extensi
on (12 motion segments) specimens. While in flexion or extension, the
specimens again were frozen and imaged by computed tomography scan. Th
e frozen specimens then were sliced using a cryomicrotome in the sagit
tal plane to study the dimensions of the intervertebral foramen. Eight
een other fresh cadaveric spines were sliced sagittally for study in t
he neutral position. Results. The axial computed tomography scans show
ed that extension significantly decreased the canal area, midsagittal
diameter, and subarticular sagittal diameter, whereas flexion had the
opposite effects. The sagittal computed tomography scans showed that e
xtension decreased all the foraminal dimensions significantly, whereas
flexion increased all the foraminal dimensions significantly. The tra
nslational changes were associated with the bulging of the disc and th
e presence of traction spurs. The cryomicrotome sections showed the cr
oss-sectional area of the foramen to be 12% greater for the flexion gr
oup and 15% smaller for the extension group than the cross-sectional a
rea of the neutral group. Nerve root compression in the foramen was fo
und to be 21.0% in neutral, 15.4% in flexion, and 33.3% in extension g
roups. Conclusions. This study supports the concept of dynamic spinal
stenosis. In addition to static anatomic changes, careful dynamic stud
ies may be required to evaluate better the central canal and the foram
en.