Four experiments were conducted to investigate whether variations in o
rientation that profoundly affect the ability to imagine rotations als
o affect the ability to imagine projective transformations. For a basi
c rectilinear object and the three simpler Platonic Solids, imagining
projective transformations (e.g., the casting of a shadow) was quite s
uccessful when the objects were aligned with the direction of projecti
on. For the solids, this alignment occurred when the objects were gene
ralized cylinders about axes aligned with the projection. As the objec
ts were made more oblique to the projection, performance deteriorated
markedly. When the objects were moderately aligned with the projection
, performance depended on the orientation of the object and the orient
ation of the projection to the environment. We suggest that the imagin
ation of projection and of rotation is a type of problem solving in wh
ich spatial structures are organized in relation to initially given pr
operties of the objects and transformations. When there is alignment a
mong the various structural components, this process of imagination wo
rks efficiently. Without such alignment, nonexperts often fail. We sug
gest that aligned (i.e., parallel and perpendicular) orientations are
effective in spatial imagination because they are categorically distin
ct and singular, and they provide a critical form of redundancy. (C) 1
996 Academic Press, Inc.