ESTIMATION OF TOTAL-BODY AND EXTRACELLULAR WATER IN POST-CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGICAL PATIENTS USING SINGLE AND MULTIPLE FREQUENCYBIOIMPEDANCE
Rv. Patel et al., ESTIMATION OF TOTAL-BODY AND EXTRACELLULAR WATER IN POST-CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGICAL PATIENTS USING SINGLE AND MULTIPLE FREQUENCYBIOIMPEDANCE, Critical care medicine, 24(11), 1996, pp. 1824-1828
Objective: To assess the value of bioimpedance as a clinical tool by d
etermining the accuracy and bias of single and multiple frequency bioi
mpedance estimates of total body and extracellular water in comparison
with values established by criterion reference techniques, Design: Co
ntrolled, prospective, single-blind investigation, Setting: Private, n
ot-for-profit, university-affiliated, acute care hospital. Patients: E
ight male, post-elective coronary artery bypass graft surgical patient
s. Interventions: Within 6 hrs after surgery, estimates of total body
and extracellular water volumes were determined using single and multi
ple frequency bioimpedance techniques. These estimates were then compa
red with the gold standard volumes measured by deuterium oxide and bro
mine dilutional space determination, respectively. Measurements and Ma
in Results: The mean multiple frequency bioimpedance estimate of total
body water of 47.7 +/- 9.4 L was statistically different from the sin
gle frequency bioimpedance and deuterium values of 52.5 +/- 9.4 (p <.0
06) and 53.3 +/- 11.6 L (p <.002), respectively, In comparison, the me
an multiple and single frequency bioimpedance estimates of extracellul
ar water, 26.3 +/- 5.4 and 29.2 +/- 5.4 L, respectively, were not stat
istically different from the bromine value of 27.5 +/- 6.9 L. In addit
ion, the mean errors for multiple and single frequency bioimpedance de
terminations of extracellular water, -1.2 +/- 2.0 and 1.7 +/- 2.7 L, r
espectively, were statistically different (p =.001). Conclusions: In m
ale, post elective coronary artery bypass graft surgical patients, sin
gle frequency bioimpedance was a more accurate and less biased predict
or of total body water than multiple frequency bioimpedance. The accur
acy and bias of multiple frequency bioimpedance was superior to single
frequency bioimpedance for the prediction of extracellular water. Whe
ther this observation remains true for other populations of critically
ill patients remains to be investigated.