COMBINED ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND LAPAROSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE PRETHERAPEUTIC ASSESSMENT OF RESECTABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES

Citation
Mb. Mortensen et al., COMBINED ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND LAPAROSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE PRETHERAPEUTIC ASSESSMENT OF RESECTABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 31(11), 1996, pp. 1115-1119
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
ISSN journal
00365521
Volume
31
Issue
11
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1115 - 1119
Database
ISI
SICI code
0036-5521(1996)31:11<1115:CEUALU>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Background: Even though endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has improved the pretherapeutic staging and assessment of resectability in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract malignancies, a considerable n umber of patients still have to undergo unnecessary explorative laparo tomy to obtain the final assessment of resectability. The aim of the p resent study was to evaluate laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) and th e combination of EUS and LUS in the pretherapeutic study of these pati ents with special reference to resectability. Methods: Each of 44 pati ents with esophageal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer was assigned to a treatment-related resectability group based on five different imaging modalities: computer tomography (CT) + ultrasonography (US), EUS, lapa roscopy, LUS, and EUS + LUS. The findings with these imaging modalitie s were compared with intraoperative findings. Results: Overall group a ssignment accuracy showed significantly better results for EUS, LUS, a nd EUS + LUS than for CT + US and laparoscopy. EUS + LUS identified al l non-resectable patients, whereas the sensitivity of CT + US, laparos copy, and EUS were 14%, 36%, and 79%, respectively. Median time consum ption for each EUS, laparoscopy, or LUS procedure was less than 25 min , and no complications were seen during or after the EUS, laparoscopy, or LUS procedures. Conclusion: preliminary experience with the combin ation of EUS and LUS for pretherapeutic assessment of upper GI tract m alignancies showed that this combination was superior to CT + US, lapa roscopy, and EUS. EUS + LUS correctly identified all non-resectable pa tients, but two overstaged patients also indicated the need for larger prospective studies to identify the indications and the limitations o f this new approach.