COMBINED ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND LAPAROSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE PRETHERAPEUTIC ASSESSMENT OF RESECTABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES
Mb. Mortensen et al., COMBINED ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND LAPAROSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE PRETHERAPEUTIC ASSESSMENT OF RESECTABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 31(11), 1996, pp. 1115-1119
Background: Even though endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has improved
the pretherapeutic staging and assessment of resectability in patients
with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract malignancies, a considerable n
umber of patients still have to undergo unnecessary explorative laparo
tomy to obtain the final assessment of resectability. The aim of the p
resent study was to evaluate laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) and th
e combination of EUS and LUS in the pretherapeutic study of these pati
ents with special reference to resectability. Methods: Each of 44 pati
ents with esophageal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer was assigned to a
treatment-related resectability group based on five different imaging
modalities: computer tomography (CT) + ultrasonography (US), EUS, lapa
roscopy, LUS, and EUS + LUS. The findings with these imaging modalitie
s were compared with intraoperative findings. Results: Overall group a
ssignment accuracy showed significantly better results for EUS, LUS, a
nd EUS + LUS than for CT + US and laparoscopy. EUS + LUS identified al
l non-resectable patients, whereas the sensitivity of CT + US, laparos
copy, and EUS were 14%, 36%, and 79%, respectively. Median time consum
ption for each EUS, laparoscopy, or LUS procedure was less than 25 min
, and no complications were seen during or after the EUS, laparoscopy,
or LUS procedures. Conclusion: preliminary experience with the combin
ation of EUS and LUS for pretherapeutic assessment of upper GI tract m
alignancies showed that this combination was superior to CT + US, lapa
roscopy, and EUS. EUS + LUS correctly identified all non-resectable pa
tients, but two overstaged patients also indicated the need for larger
prospective studies to identify the indications and the limitations o
f this new approach.