LOGISTIC ANALYSIS OF STUDIES WITH 2-STAGE SAMPLING - A COMPARISON OF 4 APPROACHES

Citation
W. Schill et K. Drescher, LOGISTIC ANALYSIS OF STUDIES WITH 2-STAGE SAMPLING - A COMPARISON OF 4 APPROACHES, Statistics in medicine, 16(1-3), 1997, pp. 117-132
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Statistic & Probability","Medicine, Research & Experimental","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Statistic & Probability","Medical Informatics
Journal title
ISSN journal
02776715
Volume
16
Issue
1-3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
117 - 132
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-6715(1997)16:1-3<117:LAOSW2>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
This paper discusses the analysis of two-stage studies where covariate s are missing or measured with error at the first stage of sampling an d are validated at the second stage in a subsample. Four recently deve loped approaches, the weighted pseudo-likelihood method of Flanders an d Greenland (1991), the pseudo-conditional likelihood methods of Bresl ow and Cain (1988) and Schill et al. (1993) and the maximum likelihood estimate obtained via the EM-algorithm (Wacholder and Weinberg, 1994) are reviewed, and some connections between them are established. It i s shown that, with respect to odds ratio estimation, case-control desi gns can be analysed as if first-stage sampling had been prospective. T he procedures are numerically compared with respect to asymptotic rela tive efficiency in a missing value setting.