We sought to identify whether reductions in cutaneous active vasodilat
ion during simulated orthostasis could be assigned solely to cardiopul
monary or to carotid baroreflexes by unloading cardiopulmonary barorec
eptors with low levels of lower body negative pressure (LBNP or unload
ing carotid baroreceptors with external pressure applied over the caro
tid sinus area [carotid pressure (CP)]. Skin blood flow was measured a
t a site at which adrenergic function was blocked via bretylium tosyla
te iontophoresis and at an unblocked site. During LBNP of -5 and -10 m
mHg in hyperthermia, neither heart rate (HR) nor cutaneous vascular co
nductance (CVC) at either site changed (P > 0.05 for both), whereas fo
rearm vascular conductance (FVC) was reduced (-5 mmHg: from 21.6 +/- 4
.8 to 19.8 +/- 4.1 FVC units, P = 0.05; -10 mmHg: from 22.3 +/- 4.0 to
19.3 +/- 3.7 FVC units, P = 0.002). LBNP of -30 mmHg in hyperthermia
reduced CVC at both sites (untreated: from 51.9 +/- 5.7 to 43.2 +/- 5,
1% maximum, P = 0.02; bretylium tosylate: from 60.9 +/- 5.4 to 53.2 +/
- 4.4% maximum, P = 0,02), reduced FVC (from 23.2 +/- 3.6 to 18.1 +/-
8.3 FVC units; P = 0.002), and increased HR (from 83 +/- 4 to 101 +/-
3 beats/min; P = 0.003). Pulsatile CP (45 mmHg) did not affect FVC or
CVC during normothermia or hyperthermia (P > 0.05). However, HR and me
an arterial pressure were elevated during CP in both thermal condition
s (both P < 0.05). These results suggest that neither selective low le
vels of cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading nor selective carotid b
aroreceptor unloading can account for the inhibition of cutaneous acti
ve vasodilator activity seen with simulated orthostasis.