In one group of languages (the Chinese type) a wh-pronoun inside an em
bedded tensed/finite clause, a wh-clause, or a relative clause can be
construed with the root [+ wh] Comp, In another group (the Iraqi Arabi
c type) a wh-pronoun inside any of these clauses cannot be construed w
ith the root [+ wh] Comp, unless the wh-pronoun is overtly moved to th
e root clause. The article argues that this difference can be explaine
d in terms of the properties of wh-pronouns in the two types of langua
ges, the idea that wh-pronouns are anaphoric expressions (or wh-anapho
rs), and the idea that wh-pronouns in situ do not undergo any form of
covert movement.