EFFECT OF THE VOLUME RATE OF APPLICATION ON THE GLASSHOUSE PERFORMANCE OF CROP PROTECTION AGENT ADJUVANT COMBINATIONS

Citation
Bt. Grayson et al., EFFECT OF THE VOLUME RATE OF APPLICATION ON THE GLASSHOUSE PERFORMANCE OF CROP PROTECTION AGENT ADJUVANT COMBINATIONS, Pesticide science, 48(3), 1996, pp. 205-217
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
Journal title
ISSN journal
0031613X
Volume
48
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
205 - 217
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-613X(1996)48:3<205:EOTVRO>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The effects of volume rate of application on the glasshouse performanc e of three recently developed crop protection agent/adjuvant combinati ons are discussed. High volume rates of application on easy-to-wet fol iage, such as potato (Solanum tuberosum, L.) caused reduction of the a djuvant-enhanced performance of dimethomorph seen at low volume rates. These reductions were largely attributable to relatively lower spray retention with spray drop coalescence and run-off being observed, part icularly at the higher adjuvant rates. On difficult-to-wet foliage (wh eat, Triticum aestivum, L.; oat, Avena saliva, L.) two different effec ts were seen. With a metconazole formulation/'Dobanol' 91-6 combinatio n on wheat, no systematic changes in performance were observed with ch ange in volume rate. With a flamprop-M-isopropyl formulation/'Dobanol' 25-7 combination, statistically significant increases in performance were seen with increasing volume rate. In both cases the observations can be explained as the result of a combination of interacting factors involving spray pattern, spray deposition and, by inference, foliar u ptake of the crop protection agent, the proportions of which differed between the two cases. It is suggested that the effect of volume rate of application on performance of adjuvant-containing formulations is i nvestigated on easy-to-wet foliage to determine the upper limits and o n difficult-to-wet foliage to determine any variation in performance t hat may occur. Such information will guide the design of field trials and may aid interpretation of field results.