RESULTS OF A VALIDATION-STUDY IN GERMANY ON 2 IN-VITRO ALTERNATIVES TO THE DRAIZE EYE IRRITATION TEST, THE HET-CAM TEST AND THE 3T3 NRU CYTOTOXICITY TEST
H. Spielmann et al., RESULTS OF A VALIDATION-STUDY IN GERMANY ON 2 IN-VITRO ALTERNATIVES TO THE DRAIZE EYE IRRITATION TEST, THE HET-CAM TEST AND THE 3T3 NRU CYTOTOXICITY TEST, ATLA. Alternatives to laboratory animals, 24(5), 1996, pp. 741-858
During 1988-1992, a validation study was carried out in Germany on the
capacity of two in vitro tests to replace the Draize eye test for sev
erely eye irritating chemicals, namely, the hen's egg chorio-allantoic
membrane (HET-CAM) test and the 3T3 cell neutral red uptake (NRU) cyt
otoxicity test, which had shown promising results in an earlier test d
evelopment project. The formal validation study, which was coordinated
by Centre for Documentation and Evaluation of Alternative Methods to
Animal Experiments (ZEBET) and funded by the German Department of Rese
arch and Technology (BMBF), was conducted in two phases: Phase I consi
sted of a prevalidation study and a blind trial (1988-1990); and Phase
II was the database development phase (1991/1992). During prevalidati
on, the two in vitro tests were established in 13 laboratories, standa
rd protocols were developed, including PC-based software programs for
data recording, and 34 chemicals backed by high quality literature dat
a were selected for the ring trial. In the 1-year ring trial, the two
in vitro tests were validated with 34 coded chemicals under blind cond
itions in 13 laboratories, to evaluate the reproducibility of the two
tests within and among laboratories. In the blind trial, the 3T3 NRU c
ytotoxicity test showed a better reproducibility than the HET-CAM test
, but compared to the cytotoxicity test, the HET-CAM test permitted a
significantly better classification of severely eye irritating chemica
ls, which are labelled R41 according to EU regulations. Since it was r
ecommended in 1990 by the first Amden validation workshop that a datab
ase of around 200 chemicals is required for the assessment of test per
formance to reach regulatory acceptance at the international level, a
2-year database development was conducted as Phase II, during which 16
6 coded chemicals were tested in the two in vitro tests, each of them
in two laboratories. Test chemicals backed by high-quality Draize eye
test data were provided by industry and selected to represent a wide s
pectrum of chemical classes and eye irritation properties. Independent
quality control of in vitro and in vivo data and biostatistical evalu
ation were performed during an additional BMBF project on biostatistic
s. In the quality assurance step, which is an essential prerequisite f
or biostatistics, the number of chemicals was reduced to 143, and thes
e data were entered into an MS-EXCEL database to facilitate determinat
ion of in vitro/in vivo correlations. Unexpectedly, the evaluation of
the study had to take into account a change of criteria within the EU
for classifying severely eye irritating chemicals as R41, since irreve
rsible damage within a 21-day observation period was introduced as a n
ew criterion for R41 chemicals. The results of the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicit
y test showed an insufficient in vitro/in vivo correlation for classif
ying R41 chemicals. Classification of HET-CAM data was also insufficie
nt in the Bundesgesundhutsamt (EGA) scoring system, which uses an empi
rically developed weighted scoring of the three endpoints, namely, hae
morrhage, lysis and coagulation. Discriminant analysis often endpoints
routinely determined in the HET-CAM test and in the 3T3 NRU cytotoxic
ity test revealed that the detection time of coagulation, the most sev
ere reaction on the CAM, was significantly bet ter suited to identifyi
ng severely eye irritating properties than any other endpoint, and bet
ter than the EGA score for the HET-CAM test. For water-soluble chemica
ls (mean time for detection of coagulation [mtc]10), the detection tim
e for coagulation of a 10% solution had the highest discriminant power
, and for less water-soluble chemicals (mtc100), the detection time of
coagulation of the undiluted chemical was more appropriate. Discrimin
ant analysis of the combination of mtc10 and mtc100 with other endpoin
ts of the two in vitro tests revealed that classification of water-sol
uble chemicals is significantly improved by combining mtc10 and Igfg50
m (logarithm of IC50 value calculated with the FilGraph program), the
endpoint of the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicity test. Further analysis of data fr
om Phase I and Phase II of the study demonstrated that chemicals chara
cterised by an mtc10 of < 50 seconds can be labelled R41 without any f
alse positive classifications. By using this cut-off point, around 25%
of R41 chemicals can be classified without further testing in vitro o
r in vivo. Classification was further improved when solubility in wate
r and oil was taken into account. The best classification of water-sol
uble R41 chemicals (> 10%) was obtained when the mtc10 of the HET-CAM
test and the Igfg50m of the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicity test were combined. F
or chemicals soluble in oil (> 10%) and for insoluble chemicals, the m
tc100 provided the best classification. The in vitro classification re
sults were confirmed by cross-validation. These promising results allo
wed a sequential approach to be developed for classifying severely eye
irritating chemicals as R41 according to EU regulations by combining
the HET(:AM test anti the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicity test results. The prese
nt study suggests that severely eve irritating chemicals can be classi
fied as R41 with a sufficiently high level of confidence with the two
in vitro tests, since the percentage of false positive and false negat
ive results are kept within an acceptably low range. Thus, the combine
d use of the HET-CAM test and the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicity test meets the
requirements for ''well-validated'' tests, as defined in the escape cl
ause of OECD Guideline 405 for eye irritation testing.