Ta. Gray et al., EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE - CLINICIAN USE AND ATTITUDES TO NEAR PATIENTTESTING IN HOSPITALS, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 49(11), 1996, pp. 903-908
Aim-To survey the use made of laboratory services for urgent tests and
clinicians' attitudes to near patient testing. Methods-A questionnair
e was sent to clinicians working in acute hospitals within Trent and N
orth West Thames Regions. Results-197 replies were received. Most dema
nd came from intensive care units. Overall, clinicians requested a med
ian of six urgent tests a day. Blood glucose and a dip stick urine tes
ting were the most commonly performed bedside tests, but 41% of clinic
ians did not use ward testing. The most frequently cited indication fo
r bedside testing was the need for speed. 85% of clinicians trusted re
sults obtained in their central hospital laboratory, but there was an
almost equal division between those who did (34%) and those who did no
t (38%) trust the results from near patient testing. A slightly larger
proportion indicated they would accept responsibility (44%) for resul
ts obtained on the ward than would not (35%). Most staff indicated tha
t better transport to the laboratory would remove the need for near pa
tient testing. Conclusions-Clinicians have demonstrated an apparent ne
ed for rapid response testing but there is a strong preference for rap
id transport systems and central laboratory analysis rather than bedsi
de testing as a solution to this problem. There is a need to investiga
te the clinical and cost-effectiveness of patient testing as a solutio
n to response testing.