We evaluate the effectiveness of cross-validation in selecting the rig
ht-size model for decision tree and k-nearest neighbor learning method
s. For samples with at least 200 cases, extensive empirical evidence s
upports the following conclusions relative to complexity-fit selection
: (a) 10-fold cross-validation is nearly unbiased; (b) ignoring model
complexity-fit and picking the ''standard'' model is highly biased; (c
) 10-fold cross-validation is consistent with optimal complexity-fit s
election for large sample sizes and (d) the accuracy of complexity-fit
selection by 10-fold cross-validation is largely dependent on sample
size, irrespective of the population distribution.