Ah. Russell et al., DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENTS IN PATIENTS WITH INVASIVE CANCER OF THE CERVIX- A NATIONAL PATTERNS OF CARE STUDY OF THE AMERICAN-COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, Gynecologic oncology, 63(2), 1996, pp. 159-165
Using a standard collection form designed by a multidisciplinary commi
ttee of specialists, cancer registrars at 703 hospitals submitted anon
ymous data on 11,721 patients with cervical cancer diagnosed during 2
study years, 1984 and 1990, Information concerning the initial use of
diagnostic assessments was analyzed with respect to the potential infl
uences of clinical stage, patient age, race/ethnicity, insurance statu
s, and modalities of therapy employed, Estimates of the yield of diagn
ostic information for each test were correlated with clinical stage an
d patient age, Judged by the number of procedures performed, the inten
sity of pretreatment assessment declined between 1984 and 1990, Substa
ntially increased use of the newer body imaging modalities (computeriz
ed axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) with high probabil
ities of revealing abnormalities attributed to cancer, balanced major
declines in utilization of procedures historically important in stagin
g and assessment (cystoscopy, proctoscopy, barium enema, excretory uro
graphy (intravenous pyelogram), bone scintography, and lymphangiograph
y). Race/ethnicity and insurance status had no discernible independent
impact on the intensity of diagnostic evaluation. Patients with more
advanced clinical stages underwent more extensive testing, as did pati
ents treated initially with radiation compared to surgery. Periodic re
view of assessment strategies would seem prudent to avoid widening dis
crepancies between sanctioned staging formalisms with endorsed and aut
horized appraisals and actual clinical practice. (C) 1996 Academic Pre
ss, Inc.