For decades, lawmakers have been debating what they can do to protect
children from the harmful effects of violence on television. The debat
e has intensified recently with three major proposals: (a) to require
manufacturers to install a V-chip into all new televisions so parents
can program their sets, thus preventing their children from being expo
sed to violence; (b) to require television programmers to display a vi
olence rating for each program; and (c) to limit the showing of violen
t programs to ''safe harbors'' when children are not viewing. In the w
inter of 1996, Congress passed the Telecommunication Competition and D
eregulation Act, which, among other things, adopted the first two prop
osals. We argue that the thinking behind each of these proposals is fu
ndamentally flawed.