Objectives. This study sought to examine clinical determinants of hear
t rate variability and to report normative reference values for eight
heart rate variability measures. Background. Although the clinical imp
lications of heart rate variability have been described, clinical dete
rminants and normative values of heart rate variability measures have
not been studied systematically in a large community-based population.
Methods. The first 2 h of ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings
obtained in Framingham Heart Study subjects attending a routine examin
ation were reprocessed for heart rate variability, Recordings with tra
nsient or persistent nonsinus rhythm, premature beats >10% of total be
ats, <1-h recording time or processed time <50% of recorded time were
excluded; subjects receiving antiarrhythmic medications also were excl
uded. Among five frequency domain and three time domain measures that
were obtained, low frequency power (0.04 to 0.15 Hz), high frequency p
ower (0.15 to 0.40 Hz) and the standard deviation of total normal RR i
ntervals based on 2-h recordings were selected for the principal analy
ses. Variables with potential physiologic effects or possible technica
l influences on heart rate variability measures were chosen for multip
le linear regression analysis, Normative values, derived from a subset
of healthy subjects, were adjusted for age and heart rate. Results. T
here were 2,722 eligible subjects with a mean age (+/-SD) of 55 +/- 14
years. Three separate multiple linear regression analyses revealed th
at higher heart rate, older age, beta-adrenergic blocking agent use, h
istory of myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, diuretic
use, diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg, diabe
tes mellitus, consumption of three or more cups of coffee per day and
smoking were associated with lower values of one or more heart rate va
riability measures, whereas longer processed time, start time in the m
orning, frequent su praventricular and ventricular premature beats, fe
male gender and systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 m
m Hg were associated with higher values. Age and heart rate were the m
ajor determinants of all three selected heart rate variability measure
s (partial R(2) values 0.125 to 0.389). Normative reference values for
all eight heart rate variability measures are presented. Conclusions.
Age and heart rate must be taken into account when assessing heart ra
te variability.