DIFFERENTIAL TRANSCRIPTION OF PHYCOBILIPROTEIN COMPONENTS IN RHODELLA-VIOLACEA - LIGHT AND NITROGEN EFFECTS ON THE 33-KILODALTON PHYCOERYTHRIN ROD LINKER POLYPEPTIDE, PHYCOCYANIN, AND PHYCOERYTHRIN TRANSCRIPTS
C. Lichtle et al., DIFFERENTIAL TRANSCRIPTION OF PHYCOBILIPROTEIN COMPONENTS IN RHODELLA-VIOLACEA - LIGHT AND NITROGEN EFFECTS ON THE 33-KILODALTON PHYCOERYTHRIN ROD LINKER POLYPEPTIDE, PHYCOCYANIN, AND PHYCOERYTHRIN TRANSCRIPTS, Plant physiology, 112(3), 1996, pp. 1045-1054
In Rhodella violacea phycoerythrin (PE) has two transcripts, a premess
enger and a mature messenger (the gene contains an intron). Phycocyani
n, which is plastid-encoded, and the 33-kD PE rod linker polypeptide,
which is nuclear-encoded, have only one transcript. The PE premessenge
r had a rapid turnover; mature transcripts were stable in the light an
d more stable in the dark. In the presence of rifampicin, cells that s
hifted from dark to light exhibited an active translation of preexisti
ng transcripts. There are indications of a modulation of the nuclear g
enome expression by the chloroplast; it may involve an unstable, plast
id-encoded translational activator. All transcripts disappeared rapidl
y during nitrogen starvation. If nitrogen addition was carried out in
the dark, active transcription and translation resumed as in light con
ditions, but ceased after 2 d. Both nitrogen and light were required f
or a total recovery after nitrogen starvation. Compared with the trans
cripts of phycobilisome components studied so far in cyanobacteria and
Rhodophyceae, the mature transcripts of R. violacea are very stable w
hen nitrogen is not limiting. The unstable PE premessenger is a good i
ndicator of active transcription. This organism is therefore an intere
sting model to study the regulation of gene expression and the interac
tions between chloroplastic and nuclear genomes.