Tc. Lorsbach et al., MEMORY FOR RELEVANT AND IRRELEVANT INFORMATION - EVIDENCE FOR DEFICIENT INHIBITORY PROCESSES IN LANGUAGE LEARNING DISABLED-CHILDREN/, Contemporary educational psychology, 21(4), 1996, pp. 447-466
The present study examined whether language/learning disabled children
have greater difficulty than nondisabled children suppressing informa
tion that becomes irrelevant during a sentence processing and memory t
ask. During study trials, children were asked to predict and remember
the terminal nouns for a series of sentences that highly constrained a
terminal noun. For half of the study trials; (fillers) the child's pr
ediction was confirmed by presenting the child with the expected endin
g (e.g., ''Butterflies Ay by flapping their ... wings.''). For the rem
aining study trials (critical trials), however, the sentence ending ex
pected by the child was disconfirmed with a low-probability ending (ta
rget noun). Thus, when presented with the sentence. ''We made a sandwi
ch with peanut butter and ...,'' the child's prediction (''jelly'') wa
s disconfirmed with a different ending (''bananas''). Memory for the d
isconfirmed and target nouns of critical study trials were subsequentl
y tested implicitly with a new sentence-completion task. In this case,
memory for disconfirmed and target nouns that had been associated wit
h individual study sentences were measured in terms of priming effects
. The analysis of priming effects indicated that language/learning dis
abled children experienced greater difficulty than nondisabled childre
n inhibiting the activation of irrelevant information (disconfirmed no
uns) and sustaining the activation of relevant information (target nou
ns) during a verbal memory task. These results were discussed in terms
of their implications for some of the memory and language difficultie
s of language/learning disabled children. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc
.