THE RORSCHACH AND MMPI - TOWARD A MORE SCIENTIFICALLY DIFFERENTIATED UNDERSTANDING OF CROSS-METHOD ASSESSMENT

Authors
Citation
Gj. Meyer, THE RORSCHACH AND MMPI - TOWARD A MORE SCIENTIFICALLY DIFFERENTIATED UNDERSTANDING OF CROSS-METHOD ASSESSMENT, Journal of personality assessment, 67(3), 1996, pp. 558-578
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Social","Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
00223891
Volume
67
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
558 - 578
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3891(1996)67:3<558:TRAM-T>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Reasons for Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and Ror schach disagreement at the nomothetic level are explored. Building on an understanding of measurement distinctions from other sciences, it i s proposed that the Rorschach and MMPI procedures are differentially s ensitive to unique manifestations of personality. By necessity, each m ethod is then also recognized as having a limited scope of effectivene ss, such that neither can provide a complete picture of personality in its full complexity. Drawing on the more extensive self-report litera ture, the idiosyncracies and limited scope of the self-report method a re documented. Finally, an ideographically rooted, cross-method, confi gural model is proposed for validation research in personality assessm ent. Several examples consistent with this approach are drawn from the assessment literature and discussed.