Gj. Meyer, THE RORSCHACH AND MMPI - TOWARD A MORE SCIENTIFICALLY DIFFERENTIATED UNDERSTANDING OF CROSS-METHOD ASSESSMENT, Journal of personality assessment, 67(3), 1996, pp. 558-578
Reasons for Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and Ror
schach disagreement at the nomothetic level are explored. Building on
an understanding of measurement distinctions from other sciences, it i
s proposed that the Rorschach and MMPI procedures are differentially s
ensitive to unique manifestations of personality. By necessity, each m
ethod is then also recognized as having a limited scope of effectivene
ss, such that neither can provide a complete picture of personality in
its full complexity. Drawing on the more extensive self-report litera
ture, the idiosyncracies and limited scope of the self-report method a
re documented. Finally, an ideographically rooted, cross-method, confi
gural model is proposed for validation research in personality assessm
ent. Several examples consistent with this approach are drawn from the
assessment literature and discussed.