A NEW LOOK AT MEMBERS OF THE SUPERFAMILY BRACHYOPOIDEA (AMPHIBIA, TEMNOSPONDYLI) FROM THE EARLY TRIASSIC OF QUEENSLAND AND A PRELIMINARY-ANALYSIS OF BRACHYOPOID RELATIONSHIPS
Rj. Damiani et A. Warren, A NEW LOOK AT MEMBERS OF THE SUPERFAMILY BRACHYOPOIDEA (AMPHIBIA, TEMNOSPONDYLI) FROM THE EARLY TRIASSIC OF QUEENSLAND AND A PRELIMINARY-ANALYSIS OF BRACHYOPOID RELATIONSHIPS, Alcheringa, 20(3-4), 1996, pp. 277-300
Two further finds of Keratobrachyops australis Warren (Amphibia, Temno
spondyli, Chigutisauridae) from the Early Triassic Arcadia Formation o
f Queensland provide new information concerning skull characters not n
oted in the holotype. The holotype of Xenobrachyops allos Howie (Amphi
bia, Temnospondyli, Brachyopidae) from the same locality is redescribe
d following the discovery of several features not previously noted. In
addition, new but fragmentary brachyopoid material from the Arcadia a
nd overlying Glenidal Formations provides information on derived chara
cter states within the superfamily. Controversy surrounds the correct
familial composition of the superfamily Brachyopoidea, with the family
Brachyopidae being allied by various authors with a diversity of othe
r Triassic and Permian families. A cladistic analysis of a number of t
hese families has been performed in an attempt to determine interfamil
ial relationships. Our results support a brachyopid-chigutisaurid dich
otomy within the Brachyopoidea, but also suggest the families Tupilako
sauridae, Dvinosauridae and Saurerpetontidae are plesiomorphous member
s of the clade. Further analysis of genera within the superfamily show
s that several brachyopid genera cannot be distinguished by cladistic
means, indicating a need for revision of its members. Future analysis
may support the erection of a new brachyopoid family for species of Si
nobrachyops and Xenobrachyops.