Jf. Griffith et al., RADIOLOGICAL INTERVENTION IN BUDD-CHIARI SYNDROME - TECHNIQUES AND OUTCOME IN 18 PATIENTS, Clinical Radiology, 51(11), 1996, pp. 775-784
We reviewed our experience of the therapeutic role of radiology in Bud
d-Chiari syndrome, Patients with stenosis and/or occlusion of the main
hepatic veins and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) are suitable for radiol
ogical intervention (35% in our series), Eighteen patients (mean age 3
7.4 years) have undergone radiological intervention over the past 8 ye
ars, The site of obstruction was the hepatic veins in 12/18 patients w
hile 6/18 patients had both hepatic vein and IVC obstruction, which in
two was due to tumour thrombus, One patient had repeated dilatations
of a mesocaval shunt; 49 angiographic venous dilatations were performe
d (18 during initial intervention, 31 on review) including 10 recanali
zations of occlusions, A combined transhepatic-transjugular approach w
as used for 10/49 procedures, Thrombolysis was performed in 5/18 and s
tent insertion in 6/18 patients, Three serious complications occurred
(IVC stent migration, hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm, myocardial punctu
re), Follow-up, after initial intervention, has continued for a mean o
f 24.2 months (range 4 days-92 months), Symptoms related to hepatic ve
nous outflow obstruction were fully relieved in 10/18 (56%) patients a
nd partially relieved in 4/18 (22%) patients, Close monitoring (and re
-intervention) during the early post-intervention period is needed bec
ause 28% of initial venous dilatations failed to provide adequate veno
us return in the first instance, Once the patient is stabilized regula
r review is mandatory as HV restenosis is common after 10 months or mo
re follow-up, The efficacy and safety of radiological intervention mak
e it the preferred first line of treatment in selected patients with B
udd-Chiari syndrome.