M. Niewald et al., RAPID COURSE RADIATION-THERAPY VS, MORE STANDARD TREATMENT - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL FOR BONE METASTASES, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 36(5), 1996, pp. 1085-1089
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: In a prospective randomized trial we examined whether radioth
erapy of painful bone metastases can be shortened using larger single
doses without impairing effectivity. Methods and Materials: One hundre
d patients with painful bone metastases having no prior surgical inter
vention or treatment with x-ray therapy and had a median follow-up of
12 months were analyzed. The primary tumor was located in the breast i
n 43%, in the lung in 24%, and in the prostate in 14%. The most freque
nt sites of metastases were the pelvis (31%), the vertebral column (30
%), and the ribs (20%). Further percentages of sites were: lower extre
mity 11%, upper extremity 6%, and skull 2%. Fifty-one patients receive
d a short course radiotherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in 1 week (da
ily dose 4 Gy), and 49 patients received 30 Gy in 3 weeks (daily dose
2 Gy). Results: There were no significant differences in frequency, du
ration of pain relief, improvement of mobility, recalcification, frequ
ency of pathologic fractures nor survival. There was a light trend fav
oring 30 Gy in frequency of pain relief and recalcification. Survival
was mostly influenced by primary tumor site, Karnofsky performance sta
tus, and possibly by the response to radiotherapy (pain relief). Concl
usions: Because of the very short life expectancy of patients with met
astatic bone disease, we now use 20 Gy in 1 week as our standard to re
duce hospital stay. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Inc.