Es. Baker et Th. Connor, MONITORING OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY DRUGS, American journal of health-system pharmacy, 53(22), 1996, pp. 2713-2723
Reports of the health effects of handling cytotoxic drugs and complian
ce with guidelines for handling these agents are briefly reviewed, and
studies using analytical and biological methods of detecting exposure
are evaluated. There is little conclusive evidence of detrimental hea
lth effects from occupational exposure to cytotoxic drugs. Work practi
ces have improved since the issuance of guidelines for handling these
drugs, but compliance with the recommended practices is still inadequa
te. Of 64 reports published since 1979 on studies of workers' exposure
to these drugs, 53 involved studies of changes in cellular or molecul
ar endpoints (biological markers) and 12 described chemical analyses o
f drugs or their metabolites in urine (2 involved both, and 2 reported
the same study). The primary biological markers used were urine mutag
enicity, sister chromatid exchange, and chromosomal aberrations; other
studies involved formation of micronuclei and measurements of urinary
thioethers. The studies had small sample sizes, and the methods were
qualitative, nonspecific, subject to many confounders, and possibly no
t sensitive enough to detect most occupational exposures. Since none o
f the currently available biological and analytical methods is suffici
ently reliable or reproducible for routine monitoring of exposure in t
he workplace, further studies using these methods are not recommended;
efforts should focus instead on widespread implementation of improved
practices for handling cytotoxic drugs.