Dw. Murray et al., THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS AND DEATH AFTER TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT, Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 78B(6), 1996, pp. 863-870
The recommendation that patients having a total hip replacement should
receive pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is based on the belief tha
t fatal pulmonary embolism is common, and that prophylaxis will decrea
se the death rate. To investigate these assumptions we performed a met
a-analysis of all studies on hip replacement which included informatio
n about death or fatal pulmonary embolism. A total of 130 000 patients
was included. The studies were so varied in content and quality that
the results of our analysis must be interpreted with some caution. The
fatal pulmonary embolism rate was 0.1% to 0.2% even in patients who r
eceived no prophylaxis. This is an order of magnitude lower than that
which is generally quoted, and therefore the potential benefit of prop
hylaxis is small and may not justify the risks. To balance the risks a
nd benefits we must consider the overall death rate. This was 0.3% to
0.4%, and neither heparin nor any other prophylactic agent caused a si
gnificant decrease. Our study demonstrates that there is not enough ev
idence in the literature to conclude that any form of pharmacological
thromboprophylaxis decreases the death rate after total hip replacemen
t, For this reason guidelines which recommend their routine use to pre
vent death after hip replacement are not justified.