Aa. Kelleher et al., COMPARISON OF CAUDAL BUPIVACAINE AND DIAMORPHINE WITH CAUDAL BUPIVACAINE ALONE FOR REPAIR OF HYPOSPADIAS, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 77(5), 1996, pp. 586-590
Forty-five boys undergoing repair of hypospadias were allocated random
ly to one of two groups. After induction of anaesthesia, 22 patients r
eceived 0.25% caudal bupivacaine 0.5 ml kg(-1) and diamorphine 30 mu g
kg(-1) and the remaining 23 patients received 0.25% caudal bupivacain
e 0.5 ml kg(-1) alone. Pain scores (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ont
ario Pain Scale), sedation scores, ventilatory frequency, analgesic re
quirements and associated side effects were recorded or the first 24 h
after operation, The two groups were indistinguishable in age, weight
and duration of surgery. There was a statistically significant reduct
ion in early pain scores. There was also a statistically significant i
ncrease in the time to first passage of urine in those boys in the dia
morphine group who were no? catheterized during operation.