C. Louistouizer et al., ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF PROPHYLACTIC IMM UNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY WITHMYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN RENAL CADAVERIC TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS, La Presse medicale, 25(33), 1996, pp. 1577-1582
Objectives: The economic impact resulting from the clinical consequenc
es of immunosuppressive strategy using mycophenolate mofetil in new re
nal transplant recipients was conducted considering the viewpoint of t
he health insurance system. Methods: The analysis was based on the res
ults of three controlled randomized double-blind clinical trials compa
ring mycophenolate mofetil with placebo or azathioprine in 1003 out of
1493 included patients respectively, Health care costs associated wit
h each event were determined by 7 French experts in renal transplantat
ion working in six different hospitals, Direct cumulative costs for ea
ch strategy were compared. Results: The studies demonstrated a differe
nce in the incidence of acute rejection and treatment failures whateve
r the cause, The three trials showed that, compared with current strat
egies, use of mycophynolate mofetil in the immunosuppression protocol
generated a 19 to 38% cost reduction during the 6 months after transpl
antation. Cost reduction resulted from lower incidence of acute reject
ion and the subsequent nephrectomics and dialysis sessions, The sensit
ivity analysis on the most important cost factors-cost of hospitalizat
ion per day and number of hospitalization days-confirmed strength of t
he results, Conclusion: Use of mycophenolate mofetil in the immunosupp
ressive prophylaxis protocol after renal transplantation allows a redu
ction in the direct costs during the 6 months following transplantatio
n.