Jl. Beebe et al., CONFIRMATION OF THE SYVA MICROTRAK ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY FOR CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS BY SYVA DIRECT FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TEST, Sexually transmitted diseases, 23(6), 1996, pp. 465-470
Background and Objectives: The Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay (EIA)
is used widely for screening women infected with Chlamydia trachomati
s. Confirmatory tests used in conjunction with EIA screening have show
n that false-positive results are common. Goals: To evaluate the speci
ficity of the Syva MicroTrak EIA by confirmation of positive specimens
with the Syva Direct Fluorescent Specimen Test. Study Design: Of 6,03
9 endocervical specimens collected from women attending Colorado famil
y planning clinics, 328 positive EIA results (5.4%) were obtained by S
yva MicroTrak EIA. A random subset of 136 positive specimens was teste
d by Syva Direct Specimen Test. Twenty of 136 specimens (14.7%) negati
ve by Syva Direct Specimen testing were also tested by Syva blocking a
ntibody tests (9 of 20 positive, 45%) and Roche Amplicor polymerase ch
ain reaction (PCR; 6 of 20 positive, 30%). Of 20 specimens positive by
Syva MicroTrak EIA and negative by Syva Direct Specimen Test, 11 (55%
) were also negative by blocking antibody and PCR, including three spe
cimens with initial EIA sample-to-cutoff ratios greater than 2. Conclu
sions: Confirmatory testing of Syva MicroTrak EIA positive specimens w
ith Syva Direct Specimen Test showed that 14.7% were false positive. C
oupling the Syva Direct Specimen test with either blocking antibody or
PCR reduces the rate of false-positive results to 8%.