Kp. Hogan et al., PHOTOSYNTHETIC ACTIVITY OF LEAVES OF PINUS-RADIATA AND NOTHOFAGUS-FUSCA AFTER 1 YEAR OF GROWTH AT ELEVATED CO2, Australian journal of plant physiology, 23(5), 1996, pp. 623-630
Radiata pine (Pinus radiata D.Don) and red beech (Nothofagus fused (Ho
ok.f.) Oerst.) were grown for over 1 year at elevated (ELEV, 64 Pa) an
d ambient (AMB, 38 Pa) CO2 partial pressure in open-top chambers. Spri
ngtime measurements of overwintering leaves showed that light- and CO2
-saturated photosynthetic rates (A,,) of pine leaves were similar for
the two treatments (AMB: 6.7 +/- 1.08 mu mol m(-2) s(-1), mean +/- 1 s
.e.; ELEV: 6.6 +/- 0.47) but, for beech leaves, A(max) was greater for
AMB plants (8.8 +/- 0.90 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) than for ELEV plants (6.
10 +/- 0.71). Summertime measurements of leaves grown that spring show
ed that for pine, A(max) was similar in the two CO2 treatments (AMB 14
.9 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) +/- 0.80; ELEV: 13.5 +/- 1.9) while, for beech,
A(max) was higher in AMB plants (21.0 +/- 1.1) than in ELEV plants (17
.2 +/- 1.9), although the difference was not statistically significant
. These results indicate downregulation of photosynthetic capacity of
beech but not pine. V-cmax did not differ between treatments within sp
ecies, suggesting that there was no acclimation of rubisco activity. T
riose phosphate utilisation limitation may have contributed to the dow
nregulation of A(max) in beech. For pine, photosynthesis at treatment
CO2 partial pressures was greater in ELEV plants in both spring and su
mmer. For beech measured at treatment CO2 partial pressures, photosynt
hesis was greater in ELEV plants in summer, but was similar between tr
eatments in the springtime.