Background: Many observational studies have described an association b
etween perioperative transfusion and postoperative infection, Detectio
n of such a relationship may depend on which variables are considered
as potential confounders of the association under study. However, most
reports have not considered risk factors for postoperative infection
at specific sites as possible explanations for the observed relationsh
ip. Study Design and Methods: The records of 492 patients undergoing e
lective colorectal cancer resection at the Massachusetts General Hospi
tal between January 1992 and December 1994 were reviewed. The probabil
ity of infection in association with transfusion was calculated with a
nd without adjustment for the effects of chronic systemic illness, num
ber of days with urinary catheter, endotracheal intubation, impaired c
onsciousness, and specific risk factors for wound infection. Postopera
tive infection at any site and infections at specific sites were analy
zed as separate outcomes. Results: After adjustment for the effects of
the variables listed above, allogeneic transfusion was not associated
with postoperative infection at any site (p = 0.407). Only a specific
association of transfusion with wound infection could be detected. Ho
wever, in an analysis that adjusted for the effects of only the 18 con
founders considered by previous authors, transfusion was the most sign
ificant predictor of infection. In that analysis, the risk of postoper
ative infection Increased by 14 percent per unit of red cells transfus
ed (p<0.001). Conclusion: The overall adverse relationship between tra
nsfusion and infection reported by previous observational studies may
have been dire to an incomplete consideration of the variables that co
nfound that association, This finding may help explain the disagreemen
t between the conclusions of recent large, randomized, controlled tria
ls (which failed to detect a deleterious transfusion effect) and the e
arlier observational studies.