Wm. Ke et al., CONSECUTIVE EVALUATION OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN-M AND IMMUNOGLOBULIN-G ANTIBODIES AGAINST HEPATITIS-E VIRUS, Journal of gastroenterology, 31(6), 1996, pp. 818-822
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is sporadic in the Guangzhou city so
uthern China, However, the evaluation of antibodies to HEV during cons
ecutive time periods after infection has not been reported. We utilize
d enzyme immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect IgM and IgG anti-HEV in
consecutive serum specimens from patients with acute hepatitis E and
compared that data with detection rates of IgM and IgG anti-HAV in pat
ients with acute hepatitis A. IgM anti-HEV can be detected as early as
4 days after onset of disease symptoms in some patients. The detectio
n rate of IgM anti-HEV is significantly higher in specimens collected
within 4 weeks (95%) of onset than in those specimens collected 4 to 1
8 weeks after onset (67.6%) (P < 0.005). IgM anti-HEV had a similar pa
ttern to IgM anti-HAV and can be used as a marker of acute HEV infecti
on. In contrast with IgG anti-HAV, 56.8% of the specimens did not cont
ain detectable levels of IgG anti-HEV (P < 0.005). One-should be cauti
oned against making a diagnosis of HEV infection solely by the current
ly available assays for IgG anti-HEV. In conclusion, IgM anti-HEV can
be used as a reliable and sensitive marker for recent HEV infection, b
ut serum specimens should be collected within 4 weeks after onset of s
ymptoms to avoid false-negative results. In contrast, we should be awa
re of the failure to develop IgG anti-HEV in some patients. These pati
ents carry the risk of reinfection.