Commonly held political opinions provide an ecologically relevant focu
s for studying the interactions of environmental context, affect or em
otion, and cognition. To explore this approach to information processi
ng, John T. Lanzetta helped initiate a series of experiments examining
how emotional responses to politicians' nonverbal displays influence
changes in attitude toward these leaders. Although this line of resear
ch has revealed how a number of variables interact when humans respond
to known individuals in meaningful situations, the precise relationsh
ip between mood state or affect prior to a stimulus and subsequent emo
tions and cognitions remains unclear Based on recent theories of modul
ar brain function, an experimental paradigm was designed to test the h
ypothesis that the effects of a mood state on information processing d
epend on the subject's awareness of the affect as well as on its valen
ce. Preliminary data from such a study, in which preconscious images o
f emotionally evocative stimuli were used to induce positive or negati
ve affect prior to viewing the leader suggests that the induction of n
egative affective states can lead to more positive attitudes. Reflecte
d in such public opinion phenomena as the ''rally-round-the-flag'' eff
ect this mood-incongruent attitude change challenges many traditional
theories of emotion and cognition.