COMPARISON OF IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF PEPTIDE AND NONPEPTIDE OXYTOCIN ANTAGONISTS ON RADIOLIGAND BINDING AND UTERINE CONTRACTILITY OF RATS DURING PREGNANCY
T. Kawarabayashi et al., COMPARISON OF IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF PEPTIDE AND NONPEPTIDE OXYTOCIN ANTAGONISTS ON RADIOLIGAND BINDING AND UTERINE CONTRACTILITY OF RATS DURING PREGNANCY, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 175(5), 1996, pp. 1348-1355
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the effects of peptidyl and nonp
eptidyl oxytocin antagonists on the pregnant rat uterus in relation to
the progress of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: Pregnant rats with gestation
al ages of 17 and 21 days were used. A saturation binding of tritiated
oxytocin to myometrial membrane preparation and its displacement by u
nlabeled oxytocin and the oxytocin antagonists were examined. The inhi
bitory effects of peptidyl and nonpeptidyl oxytocin on spontaneous, ox
ytocin-induced, and prostaglandin F-2 alpha-induced uterine contractio
ns were also evaluated in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: The number of tr
itiated oxytocin binding sites in myometrial membranes of pregnant rat
s increased markedly at day 21 of gestation compared with day 17 of ge
station, whereas the dissociation constants for tritiated oxytocin did
not differ significantly As for the binding affinities to oxytocin re
ceptors of myometrial membranes, the inhibition constant values of non
peptidyl oxytocin were 79 and 351 times larger than those of peptidyl
oxytocin at pregnancy days 17 and 21, respectively. Both drugs remarka
bly inhibited oxytocin-induced uterine contractions in a dose-dependen
t manner, However, peptidyl oxytocin did not affect spontaneous and pr
ostaglandin F-2 alpha-induced contractions except for spontaneous ones
of rats of pregnancy day 21 in vivo. On the other hand, nonpeptidyl o
xytocin suppressed spontaneous and prostaglandin F-2 alpha-induced con
tractions of the uterus both in vivo (pregnancy day 17) and in vitro (
pregnancy day 21). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that peptidyl oxy
tocin may inhibit uterine contractions by selectively antagonizing the
oxytocin action at the receptor site, whereas nonpeptidyl oxytocin at
high concentrations may have the additional effect of directly suppre
ssing the contractions. This effect of nonpeptidyl oxytocin may become
therapeutically advantageous in clinical application for preterm labo
r.