Ts. Leenstra et al., SUPRAPERIOSTEAL FLAP TECHNIQUE VERSUS MUCOPERIOSTEAL FLAP TECHNIQUE IN CLEFT-PALATE SURGERY, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 33(6), 1996, pp. 501-506
Recent animal experiments have shown that palatal repair without denud
ation of bone leads to a superior dento-alveolar development, The aim
of this clinical study was to evaluate the peri- and postoperative cou
rse and the dento-alveolar development of the deciduous dentition in J
apanese ULCP, and CP patients up to 5 years after two different types
of palatal repair, One of the methods, the Kohama (1991) supraperioste
al flap technique, is performed without denudation of the bony palate,
while the other, the Wardill (1937) push-back technique, results in a
reas of denuded bone, It was concluded that the supraperiosteal techni
que can be performed successfully in approximately the same amount of
time as the push-back technique, Re-epithelialization of the wound are
as after supraperiosteal repair takes about 1 week, which is one third
of the time associated with healing after the push-back technique, Ar
ch depth of the deciduous dentition after the supraperiosteal techniqu
e is superior compared to the push-back technique, The question of whe
ther or not the supraperiosteal technique produces more favorable dent
o-alveolar development than the mucoperiosteal technique in the perman
ent dentition in humans has to be elucidated in future research.