Tm. Withers et Mo. Harris, FORAGING FOR OVIPOSITION SITES IN THE HESSIAN FLY - RANDOM AND NONRANDOM ASPECTS OF MOVEMENT, Ecological entomology, 21(4), 1996, pp. 382-395
1. Movements of ovipositing Hessian flies (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), we
re quantified in plant arrays that varied in one of three ways: (i) in
distances between patches of host plants, (ii) in the size of host pl
ant patches, and (iii) in the density of host plants within arrays of
non-host plants. Durations and frequencies of a range of behaviours we
re quantified, with the expectation that females would adjust some, bu
t not necessarily all, behaviours when the distribution of host and no
n-host plants was altered. 2. Foraging behaviours that were adjusted w
hen plant distribution was altered were seen as evidence for non-rando
m movement (sensu Morris & Kareiva, 1991). Non-random components of mo
vement consisted of non-random settlement on host plants and area-rest
ricted search after visiting host plants. Ovipositing females also exh
ibited directed responses to plants; however, directed responses appea
red to be based on generalized visual stimuli from grasses rather than
species-specific plant stimuli (e.g. odours). 3. Several behavioural
parameters did not change when plant arrays were altered. Females stay
ed in wheal patches for relatively constant periods of time and laid s
imilar numbers of eggs before leaving wheat patches regardless of the
number of plants in the patch or the time taken to find the patch. 4.
Non-random movements resulted in the placement of eggs on hosts rather
than non-hosts, while random movement contributed to egg laying over
larger areas.