We discuss how intrinsic inconsistencies and negative results (concern
ing opinion aggregation) in social choice may be alleviated by plausib
le modifications of underlying assumptions and problem formulations, b
asically by the introduction of some impreciseness af a probabilistic,
fuzzy and rough type. First, we discuss briefly probabilistic voting,
and the use of fuzzy preference relations and fuzzy majorities, Then,
in the main part, we proceed to the use of Pawlak's rough sets theory
in the analysis of crucial properties of voting schemes. In this fram
ework we also discuss the concept of a distance between two voting sch
emes. Finally, we further explore difficult issues of how diverse type
s of impreciseness can be combined, and we consider in particular the
combination of roughness with randomness and fuzziness in the context
of spatial voting games.