I. Abrahamsson et al., THE PERI-IMPLANT HARD AND SOFT-TISSUES AT DIFFERENT IMPLANT SYSTEMS -A COMPARATIVE-STUDY IN THE DOG, Clinical oral implants research, 7(3), 1996, pp. 212-219
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Biomedical","Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
The aim of the present experiment was to study the marginal periimplan
t tissues at intentionally non-submerged(1-stage implants) and initial
ly submerged and subsequently exposed implants (2-stage implants). 5 b
eagle dogs, about 1-year-old, were used. 3 months after the extraction
of the mandibular premolars, fixtures of the Astra Tech Implants Dent
al System(R), the Branemark System(R) and the Bonefit(R)-ITI System we
re installed. In each mandibular quadrant, 1 fixture of each implant s
ystem was installed in a randomised order. The installation procedure
followed the recommendations given in the manuals for each system. Thu
s, following installation, the bone crest coincided with the fixture m
argin of the Astra Tech Implants Dental System(R) and the Branemark Sy
stem(R), whereas the border between the plasma sprayed and the machine
d surface of the Bonefit(R)-ITI implant system was positioned at the l
evel of the bone crest. Following a healing period of 3 months, abutme
nt connection was carried out in the 2-stage systems (the Astra Tech I
mplants Dental System(R) and the Branemark system(R)). A 6-month perio
d of plaque control was initiated. The animals were sacrificed and bio
psies representing each implant region dissected. The tissue samples w
ere prepared for light microscopy and exposed to histometric and morph
ometric measurements. The mucosal barrier which formed to the titanium
surface following 1-stage and 2-stage implant installations comprised
an epithelial and a connective tissue component, which for the 3 syst
ems studied, had similar dimensions and composition. The amount of lam
ellar bone contained in the periimplant region close to the fixture pa
rt of the 3-implant systems was almost identical. It is suggested that
correctly performed implant installation may ensure proper conditions
for both soft and hard tissue healing, and that the geometry of the t
itanium implant seems to be of limited importance.