ELAPSED RADIATION-THERAPY TREATMENT TIME AS A PREDICTOR OF SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK-CANCER WHO RECEIVE CHEMOTHERAPYAND RADIATION-THERAPY
Me. Alden et al., ELAPSED RADIATION-THERAPY TREATMENT TIME AS A PREDICTOR OF SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK-CANCER WHO RECEIVE CHEMOTHERAPYAND RADIATION-THERAPY, Radiology, 201(3), 1996, pp. 675-680
PURPOSE: To determine whether elapsed radiation therapy treatment time
relates to survival in patients with head and neck cancer treated seq
uentially with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHO
DS: From 1981 to 1988, 76 adult patients with bulky stage II-IV head a
nd neck cancer received induction chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cispl
atin). Those with a complete or partial response (n = 46) received ful
l-dose definitive radiation therapy (range, 64.0-77.5 Gy; median, 70 G
y). Those with less than a partial response (n = 21) undervent surgery
and postoperative radiation therapy (n = 15), palliative radiation th
erapy (n = 4), or palliative chemotherapy (n = 2). Nine patients refus
ed to undergo radiation therapy after induction chemotherapy. RESULTS:
The 5-year overall survival rates were as follows: 32% in all patient
s, 38% in patients who underwent chemotherapy and radiation therapy, a
nd 27% in patients who underwent chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation
therapy. The number of days between radiation therapy treatments was h
ighly predictive of overall survival. In the groups with treatments le
ss than 55 days apart, 56-65 days apart, and more than 66 days apart,
the 5-year survival rates were 56%, 46%, and 15%, respectively (P .02)
. CONCLUSION The time between radiation therapy treatments is strongly
predictive of survival in patients undergoing sequential chemotherapy
and radiation therapy. The use of induction chemotherapy does not neg
ate the need to avoid treatment interruptions during definitive radiat
ion therapy.